Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JTJ Technologies Pvt Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G11 applies. The user is already blocked by Randykitty   DGG ( talk ) 22:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

JTJ Technologies Pvt Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources offered are either WP:PRIMARY or otherwise unhelpful. Googling turned up nothing useful. Msnicki (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11. Promotional. WP:TNT. --Randykitty (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, highly promotional.  78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 15:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Re-creation by COI user (with user-name against policy) - Arjayay (talk) 15:55, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The previous AfD is here. --Randykitty (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly promotional - Also judging by the userpage history of the creator the editor ought to be blocked too. – Davey 2010  •  (talk)  17:19, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11 and G4 - tagged as such Dusti*Let's talk!* 18:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt: Without being able to compare this and the previous version, the prose (all that fluff about the principals having visions and dreams) is roughly what I recall from the previous AfD so a potential CSD G4, as well as G11 for being advertising. I see no reason to revise my opinion from the previous time around. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:11, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.