Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JUCY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:56, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

JUCY

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Part of a confirmed mass paid advertising campaign in which multiple accounts were used, listed sources are simply published and republished business announcements and mentions, no actual substance since it's clear the company authored all of it. Searches then mirrored it finding republished business announcements in different medias, a clear sign of PR and using it when nothing else exists. SwisterTwister  talk  01:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article does not seem to be overly POV, and even if it were, that a cleanup criteria, not a deletion criteria. This company has clearly received significant coverage in reliable sources:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - Notable company, Meets WP:GNG; a lot of people in NZ would probably be searching for 'jucy'.  J 947  19:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep a significant NZ vehicle rental company. Article is marginal but topic would meet standards WP:GNG - NealeFamily (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable company. Looking at the edit history, at least three well-respected NZ editors have worked on the page, so it's not just a bald republishing of PR. I see no reason the company name should be in all capitals, though, but to avoid confusion won't bother moving it until the AFD is closed. Daveosaurus (talk) 04:16, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.