Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JUnit-Tools


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unsourced spam posted by the company, no evidence of notability Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

JUnit-Tools

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software, creator has a clear COI, seems too promotional JMHamo (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

194.127.8.11 (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2016 (UTC) The article JUnit-Tools was not finished yet. I want to change it, I don't like to produce an article which seems to promotional. I only want to add a helpful information. An I think that is good to know, that this tools is available. There are many other tools, which are listed around JUnit. So what is the main difference to other little tools which are described in Wikipedia?
 * Delete no independent, reliable coverage to establish notability. Curro2 (talk) 01:34, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.