Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JV- The Extraordinary Adventures of Jules Verne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested.  Sandstein  12:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

JV- The Extraordinary Adventures of Jules Verne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 04:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 22:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hey - I'm curious about this one. WikiProject TV doesn't have specific notability criteria, but it would seem that if the series airs on a major network, in this case RAI, doesn't that make the cut? I don't have time at present to research, and I'm also not familiar with what did and doesn't constitute a reliable Italian source. I'll have to try to remember to search on "le straordinarie avventure di jules verne". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * TV ads air on major networks, but that doesn't make them notable. This issue here is verifiability. WP:GNG requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I don't see any of that coverage. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 07:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * It seems to have come from Italian wiki. Perhaps it should just remain there if it has not been shown in English speaking territories.REVUpminster (talk) 14:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.