Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JVC GZ-HD7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to JVC. v/r - TP 14:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

JVC GZ-HD7

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to JVC. I found some coverage of the product in Google News archives from 2007, but it doesn't appear to be substantial or from WP:RS.  HurricaneFan 25  22:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That would give the JVC article undue balance. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Retain. This article has a history of being nominated for deletion (2 previous attempts) and yet it has survived both attempts.  Once a deletion nomination fails it should be final. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I can only see one attempt at deletion - I had previously PRODed it. Regardless of whether or not there is "a history of being nominated for deletion" an article can always be renominated. 18:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment and also, please see WP:NOTAGAIN. --Legis (talk - contribs) 10:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Some weak (but unsupported) assertions of originality.  However, originality claimed is only limited and then not supported.  I'd go with delete unless someone comes up with some decent sources. --Legis (talk - contribs) 10:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.