Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWiki (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

JWiki
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable wiki application - didn't get any press coverage or notable usage during its two-year lifetime. According to the article, it seems to have been both the first wiki software written in Java, and the first database-backed wiki software - both of these are interesting, if true, but I don't think either one establishes notability. Yaron K. (talk) 17:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 19:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Historically significant early wiki platform. Dead as a dodo these days, but it was an important step with two (arguably one as an "innovation") significant innovations: back-ending with a SQL database rather than flat-files and also using Java. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Which doesn't make the software notable according to the notability guideline. Joe Chill (talk) 23:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I extended a bit the related article History_of_wikis to include Jwiki. However, I see little value for a separate article for this software. Pxtreme75 (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete due to lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Its worthy of a mention in History of wikis, which Pxtreme75 has already done. &mdash;gorgan_almighty (talk) 14:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.