Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Barreiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete (recreation of several other deleted pages). Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 13:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

J Barreiro
Non-notable biography, also recreation of material twice speedily deleted under Jonathan Barreiro. Contested db-bio. Speedy delete or speedy userfy. Weregerbil 11:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Jonathan has done a lot for the community, and should be recognised. His contriutions are obviously not all accounted for in this entry, but when his formal written biography comes out, it will be much easier to elaborate on the matter. This article will be usefull to raise awareness of wikipedia within our community and encourage greater participation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.136.12.199 (talk • contribs)
 * Jonathan has done many wonderful things for our community and his contribution's should to be noted. - Daniella Birch — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.62.152 (talk • contribs)
 * Although Jony is Uruguayan, he's still a good bloke. He got four questions correct in last week's (8 April, 2006) SEN Four Diego's Useless Trivia Quiz.

Jony olé. - archie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.238.14.146 (talk • contribs)
 * Through his input in the community Jonathan has contributed to making the outer-eastern suburbs of Melbourne more enjoyable for everyone. With his toothy grin and wholesome Whitehorse values, Jony not only deserves his mark in wikipedia but a statue in the centre or Mitcham in his honour, which will preserve his explosive spirit in the suburb for years to come. (Plans for the statue have already been submitted to the local council) - John Stowell, prominent member of the Blackburn community — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.122.222 (talk • contribs)
 * Jony should remain because, even after his country was spanked by the Aussies to qualify for Germany, he didn't commit suicide or stab us. He is a hero to his fellow citizens, therefore his story is of the upmost value to your site.

Cheers - SJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.160.15 (talk • contribs)
 * Jony should be allowed to stay on wiki as i personally would not be alive without him. He once saved me from certain death. Im all for the statue and hope to see it erected soon. He is a prominant figure in the community and deserves no less than his own wikipedia article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.61.3 (talk • contribs)
 * I once saw Jony eat a whole watermelon...That's pretty dam impressive, and you know it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.217.167.220 (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy delete: no assertion of notability --Pak21 12:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Vanity page and recreation of deleted material. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 12:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Punkmorten 12:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Jony: I think you should look into myspace.com. They have better tools for writing your home page, they have "friend" features, I think they have chat forums, etc, lots of stuff. An encyclopedia like Wikipedia is not nearly as good a tool for your web page as myspace. Weregerbil 12:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This is not fair! George Bush gets an article, and I dont! I dont want a chat feature, or a blog. I want an autobiography. It is my constitutional right under S78 (Australia). I have as much significance as any other leader or person, I have people who want to read about me. Please dont delete the article, give me a week to update my auto biography. If its no good then by all means delete. Jony.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.