Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J Penner Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was userfied to user:JPCIT Just zis Guy you know? 00:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

J Penner Corporation
Does not appear to meet WP:CORP. Only hits in Google are company's website, and some MSDS's. No independent mention/reviews. Written by affiliate of company. Leuko 18:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: *Appears to meet WP:CORP. Basing Wikipedia content on the results from a proprietary search engine presents wikipedia reviewers with asymmetric information; a situation that biases current entries based on a third party information gathering.  Please see the "talk" sections of the  "J. Penner Corporation" listing to understand why including "J. Penner Corporation" in Wikipedia is a necessity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPCIT (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: Please indicate how it meets WP:CORP, and please provide references/citations. Leuko 19:11, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Compiling the requested citations now... — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPCIT (talk • contribs)
 * Comment:JPCIT: Information.svg Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png located above the edit window.

Thank you.. -- Fan-1967 19:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity page. Republitarian 19:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence it meets WP:CORP. Arguments on talk page are unconvincing, concentrating on the need to include this company to "catalogue the development of ISO-Jidoka cross-implementation." If someone wants to address that topic, they might start with the actual article on Jidoka, which could seriously use some help. Fan-1967 19:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are countless books in Japanese on Jidoka and a few in English, I suggest that you review those if you want to learn more about Jidoka. There are many 'resources' on ISO; I suggest that you start by reviewing www.ISO.org.  Explaining the birth of Jidoka/ISO is not my goal; my goal is to develop a starting point to discuss a ISO-Jidoka  cross-implementation... who, what, when, where and why (unfortunately, a company developed this synergy not an academic institution; this is inconvenient within the current framework).  Like all currently verified articles in Wikipedia, they start humbly and develop; this is a starting point.  This discussion is marred with irony because the notion of ISO-Jidoka cross-implementation is novel; I guess I have to become a consultant and charge clients to discuss advanced system concepts, development and implementation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPCIT (talk • contribs) JPCIT 19:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Perhaps you're approaching this from the wrong angle. If it is your intent to write an article about ISO-Jidoka cross-implementation, then perhaps you should actually write ISO-Jidoka cross-implementation. This article does not seem to have much substantive material on that subject, other than the fact that they implemented it, and doesn't seem to pass muster as an article about a company, because the company itself doesn't seem notable. Fan-1967 20:18, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.