Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ja'Quan McMillian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW, meets WP:GNG based on sources posted in the discussion. (non-admin closure) Levivich (talk) 20:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Ja'Quan McMillian

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

non-notable NFL player with no indication of lasting notability. All sources are trivial. Therapyisgood (talk) 18:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, American football,  and North Carolina.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:04, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. A person who just recently made his NFL debut (as a starter, too) and has multiple pieces of sigcov, clearly enough to pass GNG: Former ECU CB Ja'Quan McMillian impresses in NFL debut from 247Sports; Broncos roster review: Rookie cornerback Ja’Quan McMillian from SB Nation; NFL Draft Profile: Ja'Quan McMillian, Cornerback, East Carolina Pirates and Broncos Player Profile: Ja'Quan McMillian #35 from Sports Illustrated; Broncos undrafted free agent spotlight on CB Ja’Quan McMillian from Fansided; etc. Silly nomination. BeanieFan11 (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: As BeanieFan11 pointed out, there's quite a bit of significant coverage out there for Ja'Quan. Generally speaking, starting in an NFL game is enough to establish notability. I haven't yet seen an NFL player that started a game get deleted at AfD, and I have tried to nominate a few of them myself. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly notable. This is a head-scratching nomination. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 23:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I just realized that this nomination occurred less than 3 hours after the page was created. If this is supposed to be a joke, it's not funny. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 23:26, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I understand why some users might have concerns about the independence and/or reliability of some of the listed sources, but his Second-Team All-America award was also covered here by WNCT-TV. On balance, I think this adds up to a pass of NBASIC/ANYBIO. Hatman31 (talk) 19:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * keep passes WP:GNG, WP:IMPACT, WP:N... --Paul McDonald (talk) 23:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep Randy Kryn (talk) 12:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Proper sourcing and coverage is presented above, one of the few cases in these sports AfDs where that's been done. Silver  seren C 01:26, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep References currently in the article are adequate to establish notability. Cullen328 (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources linked above by BeanieFan11 demonstrate that this individual has been covered significantly by multiple independent reliable sources in the context of more than a single event. As such, the individual passes WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG and is not precluded from having an article by WP:BLP1E, so the article should be kept (and improved to include more info from these sources). —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:29, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:GNG with the significant coverage found by BeanieFan11. Alvaldi (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep due to the work that has been done to the article since this AFD was started. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 19:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.