Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JaJuan Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

JaJuan Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ATHLETE. isn't the minimum requirement NBA or equivalent league not NCAA? LibStar (talk) 06:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs some improvement, but looks like he meets the GNG. I see multiple feature stories directly about him.  For example,  & .--Cube lurker (talk) 16:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * (Added those three in roughly.)--Cube lurker (talk) 16:44, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:24, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * keep - notable college player; made all Big-Ten team. That should satisfy the notability requirements. matt91486 (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment I'd like to suggest that this just be closed keep instead of lasting another week due to the relist. The nomination was good faith, but flawed in that it didn't take into account the WP:GNG.  Sources have been added showing that this person meets that general notability guideline.  For over a week neither the nominator or anyone else has even opposed this additional sourcing.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per general notability guideline. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.