Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaap van Reesema


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) -- Finngall  talk  21:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Jaap van Reesema

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG as there are no reliable references. Laun chba  ller  17:48, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  17:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I have now added a number of reliable references two from De Telegraaf no less, one of the biggest press media in the Netherlands. I have also added a number of charting positions for Jaap van Reesema including a number one hit single for him that topped the Dutch Single Top 100. Please refer to the improvements. By the way, it has become an accepted procedure now that X Factor winners in any country would get an article. Jaap van Reesema is such a winner, for season 3 in his country. werldwayd (talk) 20:21, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised you haven't noticed that notability is not the only reason I send articles to AfD. Withdrawn.-- Laun  chba  ller  20:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Well sometimes deletion notices do serve a very good purpose regardless of the reason for the request. It is just one more challenge and good opportunity to revisit the article, provide far better coverage of the artist and present a better structured article to the reader. werldwayd (talk) 20:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.