Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabir Hasan Mohamed Al Qahtani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Jabir Hasan Mohamed Al Qahtani
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

On a living Guantanamo prisoner with no independent coverage at all. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:BLP1E. The Citations used are primary sources (Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84). has 2 google book hits both mirror of wiki articles. A list Saudi detainees at Guantanamo Bay already exists.  D Big X ray  23:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/Jabir Hasan Muhamed Al Qahtani, and please take steps to establish this as the second nomination. Anarchangel (talk) 12:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I have added the infobox, page was moved by the creator Geo Swan after AfD 1, not sure if anything else needs to be done-- D Big X ray  12:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does. Name changes to the same article do not preclude the previous name's inclusion in the "AfDs for this article:" listing. I do not know how it should be done, or I would do it myself, but it needs to be done, and you should not have nominated this article if you did not know how. WP:BEFORE, WP:COMPETENCE. Anarchangel (talk) 08:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I have already included the links for AfD1 as soon as it was brought to my notice, may I ask what else does his majesty wants from the slave ? -- D Big X ray   10:28, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that is an offer I do not get every day. I will be a merciful monarch, and you do not have to do anything I say; just what every nominator of the second of two nominations is expected to do. But if you feel like it, you can retract the nomination, if you find your labors are too many. Or, since there is still not a link to each of the two AfDs for this article as there should be, too complicated. Perhaps Nick D will do it, as he finds it such a simple procedure. Anarchangel (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Anarchangel, your comments are needlessly rude. If you don't know how to fix this common problem, you sure shouldn't go around abusing other editors and pointing to irrelevant guidelines. Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Requiring that other editors follow WP rules may or may not be in error, but it is never rude. WP:COMPETENCE requires that we not allow other editors' incompetence to mess up WP. DBigXray was required to list this properly, and to know that requirement and WP:BEFORE. As of the time of my writing, he continues to fail in that regard, and continues to act as though he can not even tell he has made mistakes. And if you cannot understand the relevance of those guidelines, and will not fix the mistakes yourself, then you are also sailing a little too close to the wind. Anarchangel (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm a little surprised I could not find any sources.  I agree with nom that the article lacks reliable independent secondary sources needed to establish notability as required by WP:GNG and other sections of the guidelines.  Poking through the various Google searches, I couldn't find a thing.  Perhaps more will be written about this individual and his case that might satisfy the notability guidelines in the future but Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL.  Msnicki (talk) 02:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Nick-D (talk) 01:55, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any source for this. Also, it lacks WP:RS to establish WP:GNG. A person held for extrajudicial detention and it is not so notable.  →TSU tp* 14:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability guidelines. I see no reason to keep. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 17:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources, from the article itself, none of which are even remotely PRIMARY, let alone unusable primary:
 * Anarchangel (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Andy's Blog entry 1 and Andy's Blog entry 2 are blogs from author who has written a book on the Guantanamo prisoners WP:COI ?. arab news does not cover the subject but only gives a passing reference by mentioning name in an article about the release of Prisoners. fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLP1E -- D Big X ray  07:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Anarchangel (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Andy's Blog entry 1 and Andy's Blog entry 2 are blogs from author who has written a book on the Guantanamo prisoners WP:COI ?. arab news does not cover the subject but only gives a passing reference by mentioning name in an article about the release of Prisoners. fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLP1E -- D Big X ray  07:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Andy's Blog entry 1 and Andy's Blog entry 2 are blogs from author who has written a book on the Guantanamo prisoners WP:COI ?. arab news does not cover the subject but only gives a passing reference by mentioning name in an article about the release of Prisoners. fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BLP1E -- D Big X ray  07:15, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The sources above, while establishing that he exists and was detained, do not establish notability. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.