Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jabootu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Jabootu
nn niche site, alexa of 603,208 Giant onehead 02:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails to assert notability. MER-C 08:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. While there's a mention in the UCLA Daily Bruin, it's part of a series of reviews of websites and therefore counts as "trivial coverage".  Otherwise all other hits are from blogs and forums, which makes this fail WP:WEB.  However, the nominator should spell all this out instead of letting us wonder why this is "nn".  ColourBurst 22:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. Arbusto 23:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Jabootu and similar film review sites seem to be genuinely useful references, but information about them is spread by blog and word of mouth rather than articles in print publications. I think that Jabootu has established its own notability and the article should be kept. "Niche" doesn't mean irrelevant. --TruthbringerToronto (talk • contribs • count ) 01:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.