Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacen Tan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Jacen Tan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I think this is iffy, but I'm not sure this is enough to pass WP:ENT. Independent film director from Singapore (so systemic bias concerns) who has made four short films (five coming), all on the internet. The first has notability claimed from the number of internet views (which admittedly has some press), whose article is another issue. The sources are mostly blogs but ultimately I don't think this quote, literally, and this piece are enough to make it. Probably just a bit too crystal bally to include right now. No hits through news or books but again, systemic bias concerns since it is Singapore's underground film industry we are talking about. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:57, 29 May 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  — Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements to article, and continue improving. Perhaps request assistance from WikiProject Singapore.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements. 18:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Granite thump (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.