Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacinth Headlam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Jacinth Headlam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article does not satisfy any criterion from WP:NACTOR nor WP:AUTHOR. She won a non notable award & does not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of her. Celestina007 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

* Keep. Passes WP:GNG as she had been the subject of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, e.g. WFMZ-TV, Jamaica Gleaner Stayhomestaysafe (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

* Keep : The subject seems to pass WP:GNG, as per WP:AUTHOR and WP:NACTOR, also awarded from Philadelphia Independent Film Festival. Covideditnerd (talk) 23:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Covideditnerd (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment — Following the investigation at Sockpuppet investigations/Stayhomestaysafe the !votes of all socks & sockmaster have been struck out.Celestina007 (talk) 06:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.