Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacinthe Bouchard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn due to sourcing improvements. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Jacinthe Bouchard

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a writer and animal trainer, making no especially strong claim of notability for either endeavour. As written, this literally just asserts that she exists, and cites mostly primary sources for the fact — the closest thing here to a reliable source is a blurb which is not nearly substantive enough to get her over WP:GNG if it's the article's only independent source. As always, a person does not gain an automatic entitlement to have a Wikipedia article just because it's possible to verify that she exists — it takes reliable source coverage to get an article, but not nearly enough of that has been shown here. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  22:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  22:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC) Keep She shows up in several news sources and is on a TV show. She should pass GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 01:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, I forgot to add that I put in more sources. Megalibrarygirl (talk)
 * Yep, that works. Thanks for that, consider this withdrawn. Bearcat (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.