Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Abramoff Allegations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted (G7). (ESkog)(Talk) 03:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Jack Abramoff Allegations
Delete - This page is patent nonsense. Kelisi 00:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete patent nonsense it is - doesn't that make it speediable? Camillus (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense. According to the page history, the comment during creation was "A joke"... I'm not going to condone such a blatant attempt to get on BJAODN by recommending that it happen. -- Kinu  t /c  00:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete CSD G1 -- Samir  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px]]   (the scope)  01:06, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. -- Arnzy | Talk 01:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete --Khoikhoi 01:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as admitted joke, don't BJAODN.  dbtfz talk 02:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Nonsense. &mdash;Eternal Equinox | talk 02:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete on patent nonsense. Not even v. good satire, if that's what they're trying to do. Bayberrylane 03:01, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete (speedy) as patently nonsensical. Bucketsofg 03:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. --Ter e nce Ong 03:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as author-endorsed, when he blanked the page and said that it was time for it to go. -- Rory 0 96 03:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.