Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Anderson (baseball)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Jack Anderson (baseball)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Baseball,  and Illinois. Joeykai (talk) 23:35, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Has some sourcing, nothing extensive. The 60-6 award (I think it was) isn't notable, but he has enough coverage for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 04:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. A player who hasn't made it out of the lower minor leagues isn't going to get much notice. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's pretty tough to navigate through Google results looking for sources about this guy because most if not all baseball prospects from the last five years appear to share the same name, but there is quite a bit of coverage about him from independent sourcesV available: . I think this adds up to a fairly uncontroversial GNG pass. Hatman31 (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - Good work by Hatman. I think the level of external sources merits this as an exception to WP:BASE/N Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.