Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Arnold (politician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on an early consensus. Missvain (talk) 00:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Jack Arnold (politician)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 21:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - while his service is appreciated and no doubt his Congressional campaign was worthy, having not been elected he falls short of the notability bar. Also the article has the distinct whiff of self-promotion in tone, as well as having been edited by with the original draftspace article being created by an IP and most of the article built by another IP that were very likely either the subject or affiliated with the subject. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:28, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:POLITICIAN. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  03:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:POLITICIAN Mztourist (talk) 05:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails both WP:SOLDIER and WP:POLITICIAN - Kolma8 (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get articles just for being candidates in elections they did not win. To qualify for an article without having to win the election and serve in Congress, he would have to either (a) show that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten him an article anyway, or (b) show such an unusually large volume and depth and range of coverage, expanding far beyond just what every candidate in every election can always show, that he would have a credible claim to being much more special than most other candidates in some way that would pass the ten year test for enduring significance. This article is not passing either of those tests, however. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NPOL - please thank him for his service, but it's snowing for Christmas. The sourcing is terrible as I've ever seem - Ballotpedia, his own campaign website, blogs, some other candidates' website, and social media. He has 205 followers on Twitter. Bearian (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.