Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Atley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Keep, no valid deletion argument has been put forward for deleting the article. The only thing is someone claiming to be the subject says they don't like it. '''. ~ GB fan 19:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Jack Atley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a personal page with wrong information. Jack Atley no longer works as a professional photographer. Jack Atley is not a race car driver. Jackatley (talk) 11:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that the Jack Atley that is a former professional photographer and the Jack Atley that raced cars are different people? Or are you saying it is the same person and that he doesn't do either of these things now?  ~ GB fan 12:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

How is asking to have this page deleted for personal reasons unclear to anyone? Jack Atley is no longer working as a professional photographer and has not done so for at least 3 years. He is not a race car driver and does not do this either. Yet this page remains up and on Google. Jack Atley has personally asked that this page be removed from Wikipedia as it is not only not relevant to him professionally anymore, it is also potentially damaging to him professionally now. There is no legal obligation for Atley to have a Wikipedia page. And especially one that is out of date and irrellevant. Yet people who have never met him, spoken to him or contacted him in any way are keeping this page up - even after he expressly asked for it to be deleted. Please delete this page and move on.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 10.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  12:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  12:36, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Fix or delete According to this it is one and the same person who does / did / has done both. Perhaps this article needs either a prune to absolutely BLP verifiable facts or a request for deletion by the actual person the article is about if it cannot be fixed up.  As a photographer the person easily passes GNG.   Aoziwe (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to give people a chance to re-evaluate the article after Ritchie333's edits.
 * Keep - no valid rationale for deletion has been given by anyone. I have removed all unsourced claims per WP:BLP which should make it a bit easier to judge. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2017 (UTC) How is asking to have this page deleted for personal reasons unclear to anyone? Jack Atley is no longer working as a professional photographer and has not done so for at least 3 years. He is not a race car driver and does not do this either. Yet this page remains up and on Google. Jack Atley has personally asked that this page be removed from Wikipedia as it is not only not relevant to him professionally anymore, it is also potentially damaging to him professionally now. There is no legal obligation for Atley to have a Wikipedia page. And especially one that is out of date and irrellevant. Yet people who have never met him, spoken to him or contacted him in any way are keeping this page up - even after he expressly asked for it to be deleted. Please delete this page and move on.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.