Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Barlow

Jack Barlow was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Vanity. --fvw *  08:34, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice. We need to come up with a rule to speed the process of deleting such pointless vanity. -- Jmabel | Talk 09:06, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * I think this was already covered in Speedy policy... speedy delete as obvious vanity. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 10:32, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * I really must insist you actually read WP:CSD.  --fvw *  11:11, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
 * It isn't currently a CSD, but it would be if te third of the proposals to expand CSD is enacted. - SimonP 19:14, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense then. Dunc|&#9786; 12:17, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Viriditas | Talk 12:39, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete --norbu | &#9786; 19:17, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 20:14, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion process should be amended to cover this sort of nonsensical vanity. Delete. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 22:08, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, it does... no context, and his wife is great, too! Wyss 00:03, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just delete it. utcursch 08:54, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
 * I thought about giving them an welcome, but they don't appear to be the sort of person who could be useful around here. Delete with relish. Alphax (talk) 04:58, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.