Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Blessing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Jack Blessing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Unsourced BLP, unable to find significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:59, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Quite the filmography; if there were sources and coverage, it'd be a slam dunk keep I think. He was in Star Trek, perhaps there's something there? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to List_of_George_Lopez_characters - Although he has been acting for 30 years, his only significant role was Jack Powers for George Lopez, which was only a recurring and minor role. Google News found a minor mention for a role here (requires payment for full article) and another minor mention here. I found other minor mentions that aren't worth listing or require payment. Google Books also found minor mentions here, here, here, here and here. This is another case of a minor actor who has been active for decades but never received anything significant and permanent. SwisterTwister   talk  22:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * comment: It looks like he was the main character of the CSI episode he guest starred in, and the episode won some sort of award. 70.113.68.242 (talk) 20:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:ENT. "Has had significant roles in multiple... productions"? No. "Has a large fan base..."? No."Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment"? No. If he won "some sort of award", we might look at the significance of the award. This leaves the general notability guideline -- essentially, is there lots of coverage in reliable sources? No. Basically, it looks like he's an actor with a long history of minor roles. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 23:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.