Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack D. Schwager


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 15:43, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Jack D. Schwager

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, promotional biography of a non-notable stockbroker. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:25, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. He might be notable as an author. See the book reviews here. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - Seems to meet notability criteria as an author as per WP:AUTHOR. Multiple books published with positive reviews. Seems quite known in his field of writing. Spyder212 (talk) 19:56, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per AUTHOR. Some positive reviews ("absorbing interviews with star performers in the financial markets", "the electrifying Market Wizards, featuring incisive interviews with some of the world's most successful traders, discussion of a wide variety of techniques and markets, and a detailed chronicle of various traders' track records. It quickly became a bestseller.", ), some not so much ("The subjects of Schwager's new interviews are less than impressive, and his questions have gone soft."), but they're out there. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.