Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Dempsey cichlids in Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Jack Dempsey (fish). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Jack Dempsey cichlids in Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Much of the article appears to duplicate information from the main Jack Dempsey (fish) article, and the rest would fit into the main article just fine. From what I can see, the topic of Rocio octofasciata occurring in a pool in Australia is not notable enough nor the main article big enough to justify having separate articles. Surtsicna (talk) 17:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Science, Environment,  and Australia. Surtsicna (talk) 17:53, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete on the basis the article is largely sourced to the NSW Government source, so doesn't appear to be a generally notable topic. Other information is a general repeat of the main article, as the nominator points out. Sionk (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with Jack Dempsey (fish): the NSW invasion is just about notable enough for a section in the target page. Owen&times; &#9742;  20:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge with Jack Dempsey (fish) per Owen&times;. Cabrils (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge (partial) as suggested above. A fair amount of useful and reliable material that would make a good addition to the species article. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.