Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Dunn Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Jack Dunn Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rather open and shut case regarding improvement and notability, my searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing good with the best being various links here. The website is basic and has no detailed information and with many issues since June 2007, one of them is orphan so there's no move target. Unless, if appropriate, this is mentioned briefly at Fiona Wood's article but then again she's only a sponsor so that's not much and frankly there's simply no signs of future improvement. SwisterTwister  talk  05:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * weak keep shows notability, however small. CerealKillerYum (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete promo advert of a non-notable foundation, trying to raise funds here?, the abovementioned source is a press release by a local government department, which is connected to the foundations purpose, web searches don't yield any other coverage in independent sources Kraxler (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete essentially zero evidence of notability, from this very minimal article.As for the ref, see Kraxler's comment..  DGG ( talk ) 23:11, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.