Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Harries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 03:33, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Jack Harries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Like his brother Finn, he produced a vlog about himself. Nominated separately because there is a small element of possible  notability  from the 3 or 4 minor film roles. The highly promotional article has one of the tell-tell signals of unabashed promotionalism--a good seal of  the space is devoted to his own description of his early career, and the person reason he decided to do what he did.  DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:NOTPROMOTION. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete — Whilst the subject may fail WP:ANYBIO and the article appears to be promotional, I'll note that the subject passes WP:NMODEL (#2). However, I do concede that in it's current form, the article is untenable and hence should be deleted. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 07:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.