Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Jeffery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Jack Jeffery

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD, reason given was that he has played for a pro team, however he has not played in a fully professional league, failing notability WP:ATHLETE. --Jimbo[online] 13:19, 9 July 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reason:


 * Keep. Reason given was that they both passed WP:FOOTYN having played for a fully professional national level team. Both are signed to a Tier 1 team. We've had other keeps where national level leagues are mostly professional, rather than fully professional, as this meets the spirit of WP:ATHLETE if not the exact words. Nfitz (talk) 14:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - they become notable when they make an appearance for a team in a fully-pro league; simply being on the books of one is not enough. GiantSnowman 16:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Conference National isn't a fully pro league, meaning they both fail WP:Athlete.  In neither case do I see a reason that would justify ignoring all rules.  So delete for now, they can get articles if/when they play in one of the top four divisions. Vickser (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both as they clearly fail WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Can we have the atricle for Bondz Ngala back now please seeing as he played yesterday? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.176.7 (talk) 08:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.