Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Liang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Jack Liang

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails to meet the requirements for notability. Included source table examining the sources in the article.
 * 1) WP:NBASIC: Sources are not reliable, not independent, or lack significant coverage
 * 2) WP:SIGCOV: Sources lack coverage, searched online and in the newspaper archive and could not find anything to support SIGCOV
 * 3) WP:ANYBIO: Has not won a major award, is not recognized for a major historical event. Closest thing was helping to organize two protests.
 * 4) WP:NMODEL: Is a model but there is no coverage of it other than his page on agency websites

 Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 00:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom's sources assessment. Semi-promotional article with trivial mentions that fail WP:GNG, WP:NBASIC, or other criteria of WP:NBIO.  VickKiang  (talk)  00:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and New York. Shellwood (talk) 06:30, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Delete per nom. RPI2026F1 (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and independent WP:SIGCOV. Waddles 🗩 🖉 14:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.