Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Martin (martial artist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Jack Martin (martial artist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is litterally nothing here that demonstrates notability in any Wikipedia related way, and on top of that the article's one reference (if it can be called a reference) is to a website whose history with Wikipedia is questionable at best. I am listing the article for deletion, although I'm open to a community ruling in favor of speedy deletion (A7/G11) or a move to the draft space for improvements. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Lot's of worked with - notability is not inherited.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable martial artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:07, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no significant independent coverage of him from reliable sources. I also don't see anything that shows he meets the notability criteria for martial artists at WP:MANOTE.  Claims of notability come from his teachers or people he worked with, but notability is not inherited (WP:NOTINHERITED). Papaursa (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:Actor. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:29, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.