Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Naisbitt King


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Jack Naisbitt King

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

'''Delete: this person is completely unnotable. He was not an academic, simply an administrator of the college. Prior to working at the college he worked with the police. There are no grounds that I can see why he should be regarded as notable. Bristolbottom (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not seeing any real notability here. Just a college bursar with an MBE. No entry in Who Was Who. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BASIC. An MBE is not enough by itself to establish notability, and none of the current references are independent of the subject. Qwfp (talk) 15:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - most college administrators fail WP:PROF, as this one does. If he had been rector, dean of a law school, or chancellor, he might pass. Bearian (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable college administrator. Lacks the coverage required to meet WP:GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 01:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Additional references added. He was a Senior Proctor of the University of Cambridge, currently ranked the fourth best university in the world.  He was awarded an MBE  for charitable service to the police force MJT21 (talk) 18:59, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.