Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack O'Lantern (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:13, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Jack O'Lantern (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Subject is a non-notable horrow film (2004). No reviews by prominent critics or publications. A few reviews by very minor critics but not near enough to pass WP:NFILM. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:26, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 13 July 2010 (UTC)




 * Keep Yup... a crappy film, panned by reviews on sites accepted as generally reliable for their genre... and bad as it apparently is, it has gotten more coverage than one might expect... specially for it being such an amateurish shlockfest. For what it is (and no, it will never be an major award-winner, nor would such as Roger Ebert review it), it squeeks through WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Since DVD Verdict and DVD Talk appear to have well-established notability and the DVD has been distributed by a major house (Lionsgate Home Entertainment), I feel the subject is just notable enough to have its own article. As an aside, I'm kind of surprised that this article was created by an editor with the same name as one of the film's leads. I'm not really sure if there's no such thing as bad publicity. Steamroller Assault (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.