Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Oliver (record executive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Jack Oliver (record executive)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only source is WP:ABOUTSELF. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Music. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete pet nom and WP:TNT. Creator and primary writer's talk page is troubling. They were indeffed after a checkuser block discovered all sorts of socks colluding in promotional editing. We don't write WP:BLP's to a single first party source. A lot of their other creations have been since deleted for similar issues as well. Sergecross73   msg me  01:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: can't find any in-depth coverage that meets WP:BLPRS online. article reads like a promo/resume. ARandomName123 (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTCV. Some passing mentions in Billboard and books but not nearly enough for WP:BASIC, etc. &mdash;siro&chi;o 19:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I found only one or two brief mentions in a Billboard newspaper, and nothing else reliable. I've also noticed that the article follows a very similar structure to the LinkedIn profile for this executive, so I have a feeling that there might be a COI with the creator. Either way, article fails WP:GNG due to improper sourcing, and also fails WP:NBIO.  The Night Watch     (talk)   02:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.