Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Soifer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Jack Soifer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Person not notable. Deletion also considered in Portuguese Wiki. Tobias1984 (talk) 10:04, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Update: Deleted on Portuguese Wiki. --Tobias1984 (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:53, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

 I know Mr. Soifer's recent work and some of his articles and books. I think he deserves this page in Wikipedia as a very educated person and with a brilliant career that should be shared with the community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by fumiguinha— Fumiguinha (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Jack Soifer is one of the very few authorities on sustainable development and micro-business, a publiched author he moves in very high government circles and is an acknowledged expert. His page should remain and be added to! Paul Rees www.algarvedailynews.cop 
 * Delete The contributing editor account name combines the subject's forename with the name of his organisation, indicating likely WP:COI. The sources in the article do not appear sufficiently strong to be reliable 3rd party evidence of biographical notability, nor am I finding anything better. AllyD (talk) 13:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.