Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Swerling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Jack Swerling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is this person notable by our standards? Some mentions in the news, several mentions in books – he was somebody's lawyer in a number of cases. However his principal claim to fame seems to be getting held up by a disgruntled client, and that – while surely unpleasant – is not of any encyclopaedic interest or importance. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.