Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack W. Carter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Jack W. Carter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Actor with few roles to his credit. Coverage appears to be limited to a few brief articles in local newspapers, not specifically about the subject of this article. Not yet notable. Michig (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)




 * Keep and expand on his stage and radio work, for which he has his notability. Theater work gets coverage where the theater work takes place, and if his work on stage receives critical commentarry, that notability is his.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see any coverage for this Jack Carter there. There's an American Jack Carter who appears to be notable, but what significant coverage have you found for this one? His radio work appears to be limited to a role on something broadcast on a local radio station and he doesn't appear to have had any significant stage roles.--Michig (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - because of his interview with a national newspaper, wide coverage in some localised media also, and plenty of mention on blogs about his horror film "Sparrow". Has major roles in multiple films also - a la "Rough and Ready"  Was in an acclaimed play too. 85.210.124.221 (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * — 85.210.124.221 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. --Michig (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, sufficiently sourced. Peter Karlsen (talk) 00:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, this topic is notable enough and has sufficient coverage. --Slon02 (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Such as? I don't see anything beyond a few mentions in local newspapers.--Michig (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * After going through this article and searching for sources more thoroughly, I have come to the conclusion that he has not received very significant coverage (you're right, they were only local newspapers). Additionally, he hasn't had any significant roles in any notable productions- the center of the article seems to be Sparrow, but it hasn't even been released yet and it doesn't seem as though his part is incredibly significant in it. Therefore, I am changing my recommendation to Delete. --Slon02 (talk) 15:21, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.