Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack W. Carter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:57, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Jack W. Carter
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable actor. Ridernyc (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - There are four minutes between this nomination and the last. Has WP:BEFORE been followed? What did the nominator find? No substantive rationale for deletion is presented, please elucidate. Carrite (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Before was followed. I have actually been checking all these articles today and suspect major conflict of interest and puppetry going with these pages.  The movie and none of the actors in them appear to pass notability and many of the articles seem to be created by users with similar editing styles and patterns, some of whom have been blocked from editing. If have a real reason why the article should be kept you are welcome to comment.   Ridernyc (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication of notability, constantly the subject of COI sockpuppetry. Should have been deleted last time - reasons for keeping appeared to be confusion with someone else of the same name, and votes from socks. --Michig (talk) 06:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. One role in a perhaps-notable film. "Supporting" (i.e. small) roles in other productions.  No references or reviews mentioning him by name. JulesH (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * (})
 * (})


 * Delete per WP:NYA, without prejudice toward recreation at a later time if/when WP:ENT and WP:GNG can be more soundly met. My !vote at the first AFD was based upon my thoughts that the topic might be able to show enough (even if minimally) notability to serve the project.  My current thought is that while I did find that his lead role in the horror film Sparrow had received more-than-trivial-mention in The Courier Telegraph and Argus The Examiner and several others, a problem granted here is that, with his minimal career and only one significant role in one notable production, we have a current failure of WP:ENT. And, while the currently available coverage might be seen to tweak at WP:GNG, it is only for Sparrow and so makes this a WP:BLP1E. Actors usually end up doing more than role in their careers. The un-clued author editing the topic and arguing for its retention aside, we clued editors can allow recreation if and when the actor gains a second significant role in a second notable production.  Puppets negatively colored the topic which might later be notable enough for us... but for now... nope.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.