Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Warlitner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 00:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Jack Warlitner

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apart from the Newport News orbituary, I find no other sources to cite. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Sam Sailor Sing 09:32, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Someone using an anonymous IP attempted to remove sources I added to the article. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 23:23, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * That was me. The two references were duplicates of the obituary.  They were also not in the correct inline   format.  Thanks for trying to add some references.  Do you recall anything notable he did? Robert.Harker (talk) 00:22, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I undid your revert. The reference is not repeated. You are confusing an official obituary with a newspaper article. They are not the same thing, have you actually read them? They are completely different. In addition you removed a second reference that was never in the article. Thirdly you removed the external links section inexplicably. Not every reference needs to be inline cited, and it's certainly no justification to delete references from an article. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 02:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Certainly not the most important subject in the world, but there is substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Had some significant achievement over a long career. Seems to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.