Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack and Dean of All Trades


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. GNG found to have been unambiguously met. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 12:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Jack and Dean of All Trades

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is entirely sourced to YouTube and IMDB. BEFORE search produces the following: - Google News: Eleven mentions of which 10 are non-RS (We the Unicorns and Ten Eighty) and 1 is RS (a one sentence mention in a round-up article on HuffPo). - Google Books: no mentions - newspapers.com: no mentions - JSTOR: no mentions Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Definitely does not pass WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 08:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. Septrillion (talk) 04:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep the show has received plenty of coverage in reliable independent sources for example Entertainment Weekly, Evening Standard, Variety, Hollywoood Reporter noting Streamy win, are a sampling of some of the coverage. Disappointing to see comments based on the state of the article rather than the coverage that's out there. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The Variety coverage is the following sentence fragment: “Jack & Dean of All Trades,” in which U.K. comedy duo Jack Howard and Dean Dobbs take on a variety of temp jobs with hilarious results;. The Hollywood Reporter coverage is the following nine words, appearing in a list: Jack & Dean of All Trades, Jack Howard and Matt Holt. Is there a reason to check the other sources? I have no doubt the YouTube show exists, but the mere existence of a thing is not proof of its notability. Chetsford (talk) 18:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, you should check the first two sources I listed as well. They have subatantial coverage. I look forward to you posting word count and noting the entirety of those articles cover this comedy team. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep YouTube and IMDB are no longer the only sources to this article. I found a couple more plus incorporated some references listed by an editor above. Article has been substantially improved with all the added references which have significant coverage from WP:RS. Thia article now easily passes WP:GNG and should be kept. Z359q (talk) 09:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - two sources of coverage on promotional (i.e. non straight journalistic) sites aren't enough. The show was nominated but never won a Streamy Award. Fails WP:GNG. No company or person's article would be kept with only two reliable sources. Plus, having been discontinued, it's unlikely that the show will get more coverage. TimTempleton (talk)  (cont)  18:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per FloridaArmy. There is plenty of RS coverage to be found, e.g.
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards SoWhy</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * That's my first search for sources. I'll dig in deeper in a few but I wanted to !vote before someone closes this. Imho, the amount of coverage satisfies WP:GNG already. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 06:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment -TimTempleton Streamy awards were indeed won. Please see:, for verification. Z359q (talk) 08:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually, neither page confirms this. Both list the subject as nominated but not as winner. Fortunately, the coverage should be sufficient to satisfy GNG regardless. Regards <b style="color:#7A2F2F; font-variant:small-caps">So</b><b style="color:#474F84; font-variant:small-caps">Why</b> 08:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.