Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Dallas (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Jackie Dallas (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Actress with a some roles in lesser known shows, or a minor role in a well-known show, but doesn't meet notability criteria. References given mention her as being in the cast, but none are significant coverage of the actress herself. ... disco spinster   talk  19:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

There is significant coverage on the shows and films in which she's appeared and she is listed as a credited actress on all of her titles. The size of the role doesn't make any difference as to whether she is credible; she has done a significant amount of work that is accompanied by a significant amount of press. The article writing can change but I don't see the need for more credible press as it's already present and there are nearly 30 sources supporting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahandos1 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC) She has had notable roles in smaller indie films such as The Pining with Tom Sizemore, which have gone on to receive significant press coverage. I will work on filling the article with coverage from her more significant roles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannahandos1 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Hannahandos1 It's not about credibility, it's about Notability, which is proven by significant coverage by reliable sources. Also yes, per WP:NACTOR the size of the role played does actually matter when determining notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Deloete when even in a direct-to-video film your role is "waitress" you are just plain not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. Lacks significant roles. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 20:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be fanpage by acct that currently has several articles at AfD. Agricola44 (talk) 01:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.