Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Moore (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Jackie Moore (porn star)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable, no real sources, fails WP:PORNBIO. Natalie 04:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:PORNBIO. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flyguy649 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Comment No sources? But the profile offers two seperate filmographies. Did you bother to check them? User:Dimadick
 * Comment More precisely, WP:PORNBIO #4 says that this type of source (specifically citing IMDB and IAFD as examples) is insufficient to establish notability. Either present something satisfying WP:PORNBIO, or go to Wikipedia talk:Notability (pornographic actors) and argue for adding something to the criteria that the article does satisfy. Emurphy42 10:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Further, having an IMDb profile isn't a reliable source for anyone, as it merely demonstrates that the person exists. As it is not a "non-trivial work", it does not demonstrate notability. Natalie 14:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valrith 13:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. Tabercil 19:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I quite like her but there's no indication of passing WP:PORNBIO in the article. Epbr123 20:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and per Natalie's comment. Edison 23:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Being in 125 films within any genre should meet the prolific requirement.  The problem here is a poorly written article.  Vegaswikian 21:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: First, number of films is an invalid criterion. Second, the valid criterion about being prolific within a specific genre niche is not satisfied, as she hasn't performed in any particular niche... Valrith 01:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet a single notability requirement. Tarc 13:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.