Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Sleper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Jackie Sleper

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Bio written by user:Jackiesleper. Is she notable? &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 01:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no, she is not.— Chris!  c t 02:12, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speed-of-light Delete This ain't Blogspot. --Teancum (talk) 02:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete notability is asserted, but none of the unsourced claims makes her notable. Thryduulf (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article in this form does not include content that indicates that the subject meets the inclusion criteria. FloNight&#9829;&#9829;&#9829; 14:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article does not show the subject is notable and does not source the claims that are made. Edward321 (talk) 04:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.