Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Snow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Jackie Snow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication of WP:notability. Sources given are primary sources and not independent. Lead is a copyvio from her website. I am not seeing significant coverage on google. noq (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 25 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. David Eppstein (talk) 18:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Refs are all webpages, with the exception of the Guardian article, which was written by Snow. (At first I thought it was about her.) Article is mostly WP:OR and the fact that it is WP:SPA-created suggests COI or fanpage. Finally, there is no real claim to notability, the article being not much more than a recitation of her teaching positions, etc. Agricola44 (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC).
 * Delete I could not find any independent coverage about her at all. --MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.