Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacklyn Pezzotta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:45, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Jacklyn Pezzotta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly advertorialized BLP of a make-up artist, not based on any evidence of reliable source coverage about her to establish that she meets any notability criterion. Of the four references cited here, three are primary sources which are not support for notability, and the fourth tangentially verifies the existence of something called the "Facilitative-Directive Process Model" while completely failing to verify that Jacklyn Pezzotta has anything whatsoever to do with it. As always, Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN: a person has to be the subject of media coverage, in sources other than her own self-published WP:SPIP, to qualify for an article on here. Bearcat (talk) 06:16, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of significant coverage in reliable sources; only brief mentions of her placement at Miss Teen USA as far as I can see and nothing since then comes close to establishing notability ...  CJ [a Kiwi] in    Oz   09:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:05, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Most recent edit has resolved most of the aforementioned issues regarding unreliable, self published primary sources. Article is looking less subject to WP:SPIP. Notability exists with relevant references to her previous titles. 04:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.210.7.102 (talk)
 * Sure, you removed the sources to her own self-published website. But her beauty pageant stuff is still sourced to the beauty pageant's self-published website rather than to media coverage about it, which is still primary sourcing that doesn't assist in making a person notable, and the only new source you've added is a blurb in a smalltown community weekly pennysaver, which doesn't cut any mustard at WP:GNG because it's not substantive and the publication isn't widely distributed enough to make her nationally notable all by itself. GNG is not automatically passed the moment one piece media coverage exists anywhere at all without regard to context — GNG has minimum standards of volume and range and depth that any given piece of media coverage has to pass before it counts as a data point toward fulfilling GNG, and GNG requires several pieces of media coverage and not just one. Bearcat (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks significant media coverage.--JAMillerKC (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite winning Miss New Jersey Teen USA, the coverage in reliable and verifiable sources about her is extremely thin and superficial. Nothing more meaningful can be found in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 15:58, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.