Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackque Gonzaga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 20:41, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Jackque Gonzaga

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 14:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 14:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 14:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 14:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 14:32, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Strongly keep, the article Jackque Gonzaga has imdb page!. So, she should have a Wikipedia page too. Everybody knows her, and i know you know her too. No reason for deletion..
 * Respectfully, those are not valid keep arguments. Per WP:IMDB, IMDb is not a reliable source and certainly the existence of a page on IMDb does not justify an article on Wikipedia. 'Everybody knows her' is not and should not be a substitute for having to meet the notability guidelines for biographies, found at WP:BIO. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * All the references in the article is Reliable. Sources are came from news organizations here in Philippines. As a creator of the page, i do not put any unreliable source here.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Maybe one day in the future she will be notable enough for Wikipedia, but that day has not arrived. Pretty obviously fails WP:ENTERTAINER per nom. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:12, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * She has a Wikipedia article translated in Filipino that is published until now. Check it out. So what is the problem to create an English version wikipedia article for her?..
 * The existence of one article is not a justification for the existence of another. The Filipino Wikipedia article for her has even fewer sources and is a stub that's likely escaped being deleted because nobody has nominated it for deletion yet. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, subject has no significant coverage. Existence of sourcing doesn't equate to notability. Lacks context to merit a standalone page. Itssheenabautista (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Notability has not been shown using reliable sources because coverage of the subject is lacking. Sorely fails WP:GNG and does not meet WP:BIO. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about her aside from an article about her. Perhaps a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 09:59, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG as others have said. Existance of an IMDb page or an article on another wiki are irrelavent. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, barely insufficient sources. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Drafitify - there's a fair amount of source material (linked in this article and in the tagalog version), the subject hosts a notable tv-show, and we have an editor who is keen to improve the article, but perhaps a little new. If they're unable to improve it as a draft, we can always delete it then. Note that she also goes by "Jaki Gonzaga" Furius (talk) 12:57, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NARTIST per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and nom.Rdp060707&#124;talk 07:06, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Drafitify I agree with Furius. ~ Hxrvy ( talk |  contributions ) 12:08, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.