Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:31, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Jackson 5 TV Performances 1969

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced affair, not enough for a stand alone article. The Banner talk 20:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, please forgive my cynicism, ahhh what the heck! just trout me if you think i am being too harsh, but the creator of this article, and all the other jacksons tv performance articles, appears to be pumping up their article creation count for some reason, all of these articles could be made into a "List of The Jacksons TV performances" article if need be. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:49, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Only source I were able to find was this page. Note that it has an unorthodox listing method of starting from the bottom. Mr. Magoo (talk) 08:10, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:32, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not denying a possible listing of Jackson 5 TV performances, but this kind of yearly listing doesn't work and the work put into this isn't much (comparing with the source I provided) so it wouldn't take much for a general listing to be made with sourcing. Mr. Magoo (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.