Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Honeycutt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  02:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Jackson Honeycutt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. WP:BLP of a musician, who has no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no strong reliable sourcing to support a WP:GNG pass. Of the four sources here, three are primary ones (his own website, the promotional site for a non-notable film he participated in making, and a first-person essay on a PR blog), and the only reliable one is a purely local piece of "local teen makes an album" coverage in his local newspaper. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which every musician in existence gets to have an article the moment it becomes possible to verify that he exists -- reliable source coverage, sufficient in volume and geographic range to pass GNG, has to support a claim of notability that satisfies NMUSIC for an article to become earned, but nothing here satisfies either part of that equation. Bearcat (talk) 19:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 21:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 21:18, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Delete Non-notable references. No significant independent, third party sources. Clearly promotional. ShelbyMarion (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.