Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Khoury (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  02:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Jackson Khoury
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:GNG. This article was only just deleted earlier this month and nothing has changed since then. Simione001 (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 02:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 02:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 02:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Keep: How is this failing GNG? Multiple sources provided showing significant coverage of the player both within Australia and recently as a professional player in the United States (USL2 is a fully-professional league). Has scored and won in a Grand Final in Australia in a nationally recognized competition. Nath1991 (talk) 02:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I direct you to the following page Notability, it fails WP:GNG because none of the references in the article address the subject directly or in any great detail. Simione001 (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * None? https://www.oursportscentral.com/services/releases/tormenta-fc-adds-jackson-khoury-to-2023-usl-league-one-roster/n-5920481] - Whole article dedicated to the signing of the player. 3 mentions, and an entire paragraph dedicated to his performance https://www.wjcl.com/article/tormenta-fc-defeats-triumph-fc-in-inaugural-peach-states-derby/43546224] He's mentioned directly in all the sources that have provided match reports on significant events that he's been involved in. Media outlets don't write up detailed articles on an entire player scoring goals, short of them doing something ridiculous like Archie Thompson scoring 13 goals v American Samoa back in 2001. Nath1991 (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The first is routine transfer news and the second is a match report. This isn't sufficient. Simione001 (talk) 04:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * To add further, how does this not meet GNG after sources make several mentions of the player, yet James Bayliss (just one of many stubb articles), which only has a singular source (no other than the clubs own match report, where he gets a brief 5 word mention) does? I notice in the editing history that you created the article, but that wasn't deemed "not notable" by yourself? I'm not suggesting this player is Cristiano Ronaldo, but he's certainly mentioned enough to warrant notability for his recent history in a professional national competition. Based off your reasoning, it's clearly one rule for yourself, another for everybody else.  Nath1991 (talk) 04:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes however that article was created at a time when WP:NFOOTBALL was sufficient. This is no longer the case. Regardless this nomination is not about James Bayliss so not relevant to this discussion. Simione001 (talk) 04:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete for the third time and SALT. No sources found; this was turned down 3 times in AfC and now 3 times in AfD, I'm not sure how much more clearer it needs to be. Not notable.Oaktree b (talk) 03:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete again and SALT for mainspace - the only source even close to decent is Our Sports Central but it's just a copy and paste of a South Georgia Tormenta FC News Release, as per the header, therefore this is not truly an independent source and can't be used as a basis for notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT as per my comments at the last AFD. GiantSnowman 22:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt Lacking independent sources to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - Fails WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 15:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.