Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Murphy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:47, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Jackson Murphy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

He's made a number of appearances on local news and received some minor coverage for winning a Regional Emmy, but these do not count toward notability since there are so many handed out. There was minor coverage for making a sexist joke but I don't think this is significant. The article reads more as a promotional resume. Reywas92Talk 19:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 19:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 19:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   17:50, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although the article does need additional citations for verification in spots, there is not enough to support the excessive act of article deletion. Jackson Murphy has had enough publicly notable moments including those mentioned in the nomination for deletion that would cause one to seek further information on him as a subject. Reasons for deletion dictate "improvement or deletion of an offending section, if practical, is preferable to deletion of an entire page." Additionally, when to not use deletion process? further supports the notion the deletion process is not necessary for articles in "bad shape," as well as stating articles one is "not interested in" is not enough justification to initiate the deletion process.  Rick P  • — PicksonR (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Weak Delete - local Emmys only, he insulted Amy Schumer with some really sexist remark, and does some (bad apparently) movie reviews. I can certainly imagine when his career develops (hopefully in a positive direction), but at the moment, I think this is WP:TOOSOON. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. I have to say that the article is WP:TOOSOON despite winning local Emmys, and the mentions of this reviewer using sexist remarks toward Amy Schumer in 2016 and criticism about a review for the film Inception from the reviewer's tweenage years. Pahiy (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * To be clear he got one local Emmy – that year the New York regional gave out over 100 awards, many of which to multiple people. Reywas92Talk 23:26, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I don't see how WP:NENT is met or WP:GNG. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not coming up with sufficient sources to support notability. He garnered some attention years ago for being a child movie reviewer, typical novelty coverage. The Schumer incident is tabloid fodder but not significant. Doesn't meet WP:NENT or WP:BASIC. Schazjmd   (talk)  20:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - the subject has only trivial media mentions and insufficient coverage to demonstrate notability. Getting media attention for some tweets is not cause for inclusion in an Encyclopaedia-Such-change47 (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.