Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was stubify. There are no suggestions for stubification; the consensus is towards keep; however, the promotional language needs to be addressed. (non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 01:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Jackson Rancheria Casino Resort

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article full of puffery. . Almost the entire content, is based upon a thoroughly unreliable source--their own web page.  DGG ( talk ) 19:57, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - presently an advertisement masquerading as an article. Even if sufficiently cleaned up, I've found no independent reliable sources to establish notability. I see trivial coverage (stories about people winning money, passing mentions in articles about gambling law changes, etc) but nothing in-depth. --Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 20:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Here are some sources that I believe satisfy WP:GNG:           Toohool (talk) 23:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - also ridiculous, but only slightly less absurd, than proposing the article about their reservation be deleted.,  —Мандичка YO 😜 20:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – This could potentially be selectively merged to Jackson Rancheria, if Jackson Rancheria is not deleted. North America1000 21:30, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The fact that an article has a promotional tone and lacks reliable sources is an argument to improve the article, not an argument to delete it. Toohool (talk) 22:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep:- Promotional wording is not a valid reason for article's deletion via WP:AfD. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 07:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:54, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I favor keeping articles about major Native American business ventures. Independent sources are available, and any promotional material can be removed through the normal editing process. Disclosure: I once stayed at this resort during a business visit to the Jackson, California area. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:14, 19 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.