Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackson Rhythmist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Jackson Rhythmist

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about fictional guitar, original research with no references, hangs around since 2006. Doesn't seem to be even a somewhat popular meme. Contains links to particular persons/acts, which look offensive/abusive for these persons/acts. GreyCat (talk) 21:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax? Even if it isn't, it is completely not notable. D ARTH P ANDA duel 21:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't understand.  If it's fictional, how can it be highly sought after, or rare?  Except in the fictional context, obviously, but the article doesn't seem to be saying that.  Anyway, whatever it is, it isn't notable.  gnfnrf (talk) 22:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - There isn't enough context to say that that it's even a guitar until the end of the 1st sentence. No mention of it in the website and it looks like a tub of jargon. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 10:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.